منشور

‏2 متابعين اتباع
0
Avatar

3D vs 2.5D processing

I have just processed a job to create a 3D image.

https://www.mapsmadeeasy.com/maps/public_3D/203188bdb60641529bcefedae5d625e4/

I think the results are good but wonder if it can be improved further by choosing the full 3D processing option. The site was flown 3 time. Once nadir then from a lower altitude flying east west with the camera on an angle then I flew it again flying north south from 10 metres lower again.

I did not fly around each individual building to take photos as some articles have suggested. The results will be used on a website with the iframe link.

Considering the method and end result is there any benefit from reprocessing it through the full 3D pathway or will the improvements be minimal.

JB

 

James Booth

تعليق رسمي

Avatar

 It looks there is already some decent detail on the verticals so the detail is there. The real question is whether you want the overhangs to be rendered or not. 

Keep in mind that this is just a low resolution web preview. If you want better detail on your website you could download the OBJ/JPG/MTL file set and upload them to Sketchfab which has a pretty sweat browser-based viewer. That may give a higher quality experience to visitors of your site.

Tudor
إجراءات التعليق ارتباط ثابت

الرجاء تسجيل الدخول لترك تعليق.

تعليق واحد