Only partial rendering of area.

This is the second time I shot this mission. Flew it at 350 and 250. I assumed that the higher did not capture enough variation in the pix so I flew lower to get more detail, hence a better scan. Result is similar though. I did get low signal warnings from my phone/remote toward the back half of the property. Can't imagine that would cause poor image quality. Also you will notice that the map and the satellite image don't properly align. Ideas? https://www.mapsmadeeasy.com/maps/public/d47b3cdf21c94bccb700e44f2acf66c7/

Jeff Houk 28 de Março de 2022 11:37

Comentário oficial

All of the images are there as we can see by the red dots in the overlap report. The western section was filled in with our Flat Map system since that section was not able to be photogrammetrically reconstructed.

Bare trees are the hardest thing to cover, especially in full sunlight. The shadows make something that is hard even harder. If you have bare trees you will be better off collecting your data while the conditions are overcast to minimize the complexity. You need to have a lot of overlap. Regular trees take 80% or more. Bare trees can require 85+% to turn out well and even then there are no guarantees. This is especially true with lower quality cameras.

Zane 28 de Março de 2022 22:33

iniciar sessão para comentar.

3 comentários

Any idea on the satellite overlap problem?

Jeff Houk 29 de Março de 2022 15:50 0 votos

When you are have a lot of things that don't turn out well in the map it can throw the good parts off a bit. If you need to save what you have I would recommend using GCPs that you select by right clicking on the source map and doing a manual realignment to that.

Zane 30 de Março de 2022 01:10 0 votos