That area is 100% trees (most of which are dead or bare) which will require AT LEAST 80%/80% overlap. This is 80% for both along track and across track values. Your along track overlap looks good but your across track overlap is almost non-existant.
Having one value higher than the other has its place when trying to optimize your flight but all the way you have it does is slow your flight down and give you really asymmetrical overlap which doesn't work out well on trees. Also, the images are really streaked.
It seems your other maps did this as well but they turned out a bit better because due to better lighting but there were still large overlap problems.
Please use more symmetrical overlap values like 80/80, not 90/50.
The bigger issue here is that you flew one pass while moving forward and the next while moving backwards. This is warned against in our Data Collection guidelines that are agreed to at the time of upload:
"Never Fly Backwards or Sideways - Collect all of your data while traveling forward. Most aerial cameras have rolling shutters and mixing forward and backward flight ruins the chances of the job turning out well."
If you had collected all the data with the camera oriented along the path of travel it would likely have turned out.
